![]() Oxford: has very good explanations, but they are often oversimplified also the exercises are quite easy compared to other book. I had the opportunities of trying 3 different math books, including Pearson, Oxford, and Cambridge.ฤก. ![]() Jokes aside, I hear great things about the Pearson Baccalaureate book, it sounds like it could be worth trying out. The important thing is, stay away from the Haese and Harris book If you're trying to get in practice for a test, I'd recommend IBID. ![]() If you plan to work on math HL before school starts, I'd recommend Cambridge. It's definitely a lot better than Haese and Harris. I don't like their explanations too much though, but that could be just something that doesn't work for me, rather than an issue with the book itself. It looks like it would be the best for exam preparation. The IBID book has a lot of questions, and they do seem to match the type of question that appears in papers. The topics are, at least for me, fairly jumbled up and there are many parts where you don't feel a logical progression. That being said, both Cambridge and the IBID books are good, it's honestly just the Haese and Harris book that isn't too good. ![]() I personally like the Cambridge book the best, it's the easiest to work with on your own. I have the Cambridge, Haese&Harris and the IBID books, and will be getting the Pearson Baccalaureate book from my school in August.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |